![]() | |
« Career Planning: Do it Directionally | Leading Blog Main Page | The Great Brain Robbery » 06.29.07
History Speaks on Change and InnovationThe legendary historians Will and Ariel Durant distilled the lessons of thousands of years of history to give us this balanced conclusion regarding change:Out of every hundred new ideas ninety-nine or more will probably be inferior to the traditional responses which they propose to replace. ![]() So the conservative who resists change is as valuable as the radical who proposes it—perhaps as much more valuable as roots are more vital than grafts. It is good that new ideas should be heard, for the sake of the few that can be used; but it is also good that new ideas should be compelled to go through the mill of objection, opposition, and contumely; this is the trial heat which innovations must survive before being allowed to enter the human race. It is good that the old should resist the young, and that the young should prod the old; out of this tension, as out of the strife of the sexes and the classes, comes a creative tensile strength, a stimulated development, a secret and basic unity and movement of the whole. Perhaps we shouldn't be so quick to dismiss the old. How do you know when to embrace the new?
Posted by Michael McKinney at 12:37 AM
TrackBackTrackBack URL for this entry: |
|
|
Copyright ©1998-2007 LeadershipNow / M2 Communications All Rights Reserved All materials contained in http://www.LeadershipNow.com are protected by copyright and trademark laws and may not be used for any purpose whatsoever other than private, noncommercial viewing purposes. Derivative works and other unauthorized copying or use of stills, video footage, text or graphics is expressly prohibited. LeadershipNow is a trademark of M2 Communications. |
Comments
I recently experienced the tension mentioned in this short but wise viewpoint on change.
I was presenting a new idea to the language department head on ways to leverage technology with regard to learning a foreign language. At first resented the “closed” mindedness of the dept. head at the university to whom I was presenting, and then I realized that his questions were not attacks at me, but rather defenses of himself and his ideas. In essence each question of how my novel idea would be a benefit to the department and its educational mission was an effort by him to resolve personal concerns. And at the moment that I had this realization, I stopped being wary and defensive; from there we began to collaborate and really work on the issue together. In the end I walked away having gained a greater understanding of 1) his personal reservations 2) why nothing had been done in the past and 3) some greatly improved ideas in preparation for the final briefing to the dean.
I now realize that he was the Ying to my Yang and together we made the idea better. I could not have developed the same comprehensive plan without him. Likewise, he had never imagined the opportunities I presented until our meeting.
So fear not the nay sayer, rather learn their concerns and work to resolve them together.
Posted by: Ammon Campbell | June 30, 2007 11:38 AM