![]() | |
« Caesar’s Leadership: Stick to Your Guns | Leading Blog Main Page | What Makes a President Great? » 06.23.08
Define the Correct QuestionBusiness environmentalist Jack Giampalmi, remarked in a recent speech the importance of asking the right question if we are to get the solution that will bring change.Solutions are easy. Where leadership is essential is in defining and understanding the real question. For example, global warming, or climate change, finds its way onto many agendas, and many agendas may even be hidden. But is the right question being asked? Be sure to know what the real question is when faced with a problematic issue. We are constantly being bombarded and facing hidden agendas while solving problems which address the wrong question. This hinders sustainability.
Posted by Michael McKinney at 03:37 PM
TrackBackTrackBack URL for this entry: |
|
Copyright ©1998-2012 LeadershipNow / M2 Communications All Rights Reserved All materials contained in http://www.LeadershipNow.com are protected by copyright and trademark laws and may not be used for any purpose whatsoever other than private, noncommercial viewing purposes. Derivative works and other unauthorized copying or use of stills, video footage, text or graphics is expressly prohibited. LeadershipNow is a trademark of M2 Communications. |
Comments
what would be an example of the right question?
Posted by: rob a | June 24, 2008 06:34 AM
I think the point is one of perspective. Often, there is a failure to understand the real issue at hand until someone frames the appropriate question. A recent blogger discussed the concept of know thy customer. They noted how Microsoft began to lose focus because they focused more on the product. Companies often lose sight by becoming enamored with their product or project. Product quality is important but first you need to know what the customer wants. Again a matter of changing your perspective. Another example for me is an old episode of the new Star Trek from the 1980's. In it, the episode developed on the need to determine if the android DATA was sentient or not. Ultimately, the court had to make a determination in order to determine the Android's supposed Right to participate in an experiment. Not till the end did the CAPTAIN Jean Luc realize that the real issue at hand was Slavery by the decision of the court. Ultimately, they were not deciding if he was sentient or not, rather, would they be creating a ruling authorizing slavery for any future Androids like DATA should they come into being. Sounds simple but it really demonstrates, in hindsight, it always appears simple. Digging deep, asking questions, framing the issues, listening to different opinions, being open to ideas, all lead to a moment when you get to the heart of the matter and there can be the supposed right question.
Posted by: Matthew Laos | June 24, 2008 10:40 PM