![]() | |
« Newswire: Keeping Calm in a Crisis | Leading Blog Main Page | Newswire: October 28, 2008 Learning from Success and Failure » 10.27.08
Weeding Out the Leaders We NeedIn Time magazine this week, Michael Kinsley writes that we don’t just need a good man in the White House this time, we need a great man. He thinks both candidates have the seeds of greatness, but “unfortunately”—and this is what caught my eye—“our current political system seems designed to weed out precisely the qualities that are most needed at the moment.”![]() He suggests that at a time like this we need astringency, not empathy. Feeling our pain won’t get it done. We need leaders willing to tell people what they don’t want to hear. “It's not comforting people about their current situation and reassuring them it will get better. It's telling them that the situation is likely to get worse and that only their efforts can determine how soon it will start getting better. Astringent leadership is Churchill calling on Britons to ‘brace ourselves to our duties.’” But he’s right. Who wants to put that in the White House? We vote for people that tell us that they will fix everything and not bother us. We vote for people that don’t make us take responsibility—who can place the blame somewhere else—who will level the playing field at someone else’s expense—smooth talk over straight talk. History teaches us that this always comes at a cost. It’s problematic for both leaders and followers. Both get their roles wrong and both pay a price. Kinsley writes: We have lucked out several times in our history when implausible characters showed unexpected greatness when it was needed: a country lawyer from Illinois, a spoiled patrician in a wheelchair, to name two obvious examples. Even more miraculous (though troublesome for democracy), both Lincoln and F.D.R. were elected by promising more or less the opposite of what they did in office. Lincoln said he'd preserve the institution of slavery. F.D.R. said he'd balance the federal budget.Can we expect this fortuitous turn of events again?
Posted by Michael McKinney at 10:56 AM
TrackBackTrackBack URL for this entry: |
|
Copyright ©1998-2010 LeadershipNow / M2 Communications All Rights Reserved All materials contained in http://www.LeadershipNow.com are protected by copyright and trademark laws and may not be used for any purpose whatsoever other than private, noncommercial viewing purposes. Derivative works and other unauthorized copying or use of stills, video footage, text or graphics is expressly prohibited. LeadershipNow is a trademark of M2 Communications. |
Comments
I think you're right on. It kind of reminds me of Jim Collins "Brutal Facts." We need a leader who will help us face the brutal facts rather than naive optimism. Whoever wins I don't envy them because it is going to be an incredibly tough job.
Posted by: Jeff Brainard | October 28, 2008 11:33 AM
I recently commented on this matter on Wharton's Knowledge at Work blog article on Eyes on the Wrong Prize.
Clearly, we are witnessing a failure in leadership which crosses through government, corporate america, and countless associations and individuals to numerous to mention. This is all a dramatic result of a complete lack or understanding of leadership and management.
Management provides tools to make things better not worse.
Leadership ensures the right things are being done. Steven Covey's book quoted Warren Bennis that "management is doing things right and leadership is doing the right things." We are now witnessing the results of this failing of both leadership and management on a gargantuan level the effects of which may be to put the world's economic health and well being at risk.
I often write on the blog "Leadership Now" in an effort to help raise an awareness of the importance of the Leadership IQ for our society. Often, I feel like I am writing in vain to the minuscule few interested in the subject. It is amazing to me how many people in our society are entrusted with positions of huge responsibility yet lack the basics of a fundamental leadership skills or training. To my chagrin, very few organizations offer any real leadership training, say the United States Military. This is not to say that this needs to be a pre-requisite but society would benefit from taking the subject of leadership more seriously. Every member of society should understand leadership. It's a fundamental part of being a worker, parent, mentor, coach, sibling, child or even friend.
Leadership is where your collective Wisdom (the continuing development of your personal, spiritual, and intellectual activities and life experiences good and bad) meets the Realities of Life(avoiding delusion), then makes Judgements which are merely (decisions based on your best estimate of courses of action) then takes Actions which have recognizable Results (definable success or failure) that allows you to take Accountability (personal responsibility)
The good news is that this is a moment for leadership to shine because it is in crisis when leadership's mettle is tested, however, it is also a moment to be cautious because it is also a time where the masses of fear can be swayed by pseudo leaders who spout fearful language in charasmatic bravado.
Posted by: Matthew Laos | October 28, 2008 01:12 PM
Thanks for the blogs and comments on leadership. There is a lack of leadership in our country. When the presidential candidates think being leader is about criticizing and being negative about the opponent, that's not it. Nor is leadership promising to fix all our problems for us.
I agree that leadership can and should be taught. We teach high school students about leadership in our after-school programs (see us at www.EntrepreneursNOW.org) that then motivates them to be successful in their aspirations.
Posted by: Dorothy Suter | October 29, 2008 08:57 PM