McCain and Obama: What Kind of Leaders Are They?
David Gergen, director of the
Center for Public Leadership at the Harvard Kennedy School, thinks that while we have gotten a sense of where our presidential candidates stand on important issues and a general idea of their background, we need to more about them as leaders. How do they engage followers, listen, treat allies and adversaries? How well do they persevere and respond to the unexpected and the urgent?
Gergen wrote in the
Boston Globe that unfortunately “voters are typically left with more than candidates’ self serving, bumper sticker-caliber assertions: ‘strong leadership,’ ‘proven leadership,’ ‘new leadership,’ etc.” He adds, “perhaps more urgently than at any time since Franklin D. Roosevelt was in office, the United States needs an extraordinary leader in the White House.”
To this end, last month the Center for Public Leadership in association with The Ken Blanchard Companies, convened a group of more than 200 people to develop questions for the candidates that get at their leadership capabilities. The following list of 15 questions from that meeting, is to serve as a kind of “job interview” to get at the candidates’ leadership capacity:
Who Are You Really?
- Values: What are your five core values and how do they shape how you lead?
- Attributes & Competencies: What are the attributes and competencies you value most in yourself that will serve you well in the White House?
- Weaknesses & Mistakes: Recent American history has many examples of leaders whose weaknesses brought them down. What are your tendencies that could cause your presidency to fail?
- People I Have Learned From: What historical figure has exercised leadership in a way that you aspire to? What were their strengths? Tell us about a situation that tested their leadership.
- Multicultural Experience/World View: What experiences have helped you deeply understand the mindset and values of other cultures?
Who Will Be at The Table With You?
- Building a Team: Tell us about a high performing team that you’ve built. What made it high-performing?
- Coalition Building: Can you share some examples of when you were a catalyst who brought groups with polarized opinions together so that all voices were at the table?
- Increasing Participation: The internet and technology have flattened the political playing field, allowing for more participation and collective decision making. How will you create a more participatory democracy and give people the opportunity to influence decision making?
- Increasing Participation: Young people have engaged in this election in greater numbers than ever before. Please give us some examples of how you have listened and responded to the next generation in your campaign. How will you keep the next generation engaged?
How Will You Decide?
- Decision Making Style: The president’s role requires decisiveness. Please share some examples of your ability and willingness to be decisive. Can you tell us about a time when a lack of decisiveness got you into trouble? In retrospect, what would you have done differently?
- Judgment: Tell us about a time when your judgment was tested in crisis. What do you want us to appreciate about your judgment?
How Will You Act? And What Will You Act On?
- Leading Change: Can you give us an example of how you have overcome resistance to bring about a needed change?
- Innovative Thinking: How will you create an environment for innovation within your leadership team?
- Building the Confidence of Others: What are the first few things you’ll do to raise confidence at home and abroad?
- Priorities Indicative of Values: The USA ranks 1st in incarceration and 18th in high school graduation. What leadership skills and values do you bring to the challenge of reversing these numbers? Can you point to three things in your past that will help us understand that you care about this challenge?
What questions would you ask?
Comments
I am a huge fan of David Gergen. His public service in both Republican and Democratic administrations is a model for everyone because he transcends party politics and his concern is the welfare of the country. This is the epitome of professionalism. I think the effort to craft solid leadership questions for both candidates is great. However, I suspect that the answers themselves are less important then the discussion of leadership itself. Actually, I am happy with the candidates and really prefer to ask these questions to the American people. What have you done as an American to warrant your right to citizenry. I am reminded of the movie Starship Troopers. While panned as a movie I suspect, it really had some interesting ideas. I was struck by how the main character gave a eulogy for his friend and said something about her death in battle. He didn't understand what it meant to be called a Citizen. In the movie, only persons who completed Military service could be citizens in their society. Now with her death he understood what this meant. He now defined citizenry as nothing less then the "her willingness to take personal responsibility for the survival of the human race." Can you imagine holding every American to any standard, let alone this. Maybe, the truth about this election is that we need to stop critiquing the candidates and turn the spotlight on the American people. We need to raise the leadership quotient of the American people, not necessarily the candidates.
Posted by: Matthew Laos | June 18, 2008 11:17 AM