![]() | |
« Bringing Your Emotions Under Control | Leading Blog Main Page | Define the Correct Question » 06.20.08
Caesar’s Leadership: Stick to Your Guns
At the town of Placentia on the banks of the Po in northern Italy, Caesar faced a full-scale mutiny by his troops. Led by malcontents in the ninth legion, the soldiers demanded more pay, but the heart of their complaint was that there were no spoils in this war as there had been in Gaul. They would fight for months to defeat an army or conquer a town, then Caesar would forgive his enemies and march on. His soldiers craved gold, women, and slaves, not clemency for the vanquished.
![]() Most generals would have called the mutinous leaders together and worked out a compromise—but not Caesar. Instead, he ordered the whole army to assemble and then began to speak. He said he felt like a father faced by spoiled and unruly children. He had always seen to their needs before his own and had provided them with everything he had promised. Did they really want to see Italy laid waste like Gaul or Germany? Did they think they were better than their fellow Romans on the other side? They were proud soldiers fighting a war of principle, not a horde of ravaging barbarians sacking cities for plunder. They demanded their own way? They would not get it. Armies, he declared, cannot exist without discipline. He would therefore decimate the entire ninth legion, executing every tenth man among them as punishment and a warning to any who might question him in the future. The whole army begged Caesar to reconsider and spare the ninth legion. They were wrong to defy him, they confessed, and earnestly beseeched him not to kill men who had served him bravely for many years. Caesar reluctantly agreed to show mercy on the condition that he was given the names of the ringleaders of the rebellion, twelve of whom he would choose by lot and execute. This they did, sparing the life of one innocent man and killing in his place the centurion who had vengefully accused him. Caesar had faced down thousands of his own men and won their respect and loyalty by not yielding an inch. Adapted from Julius Caesar by Philip Freeman.
Posted by Michael McKinney at 09:10 AM
TrackBackTrackBack URL for this entry: |
|
Copyright ©1998-2012 LeadershipNow / M2 Communications All Rights Reserved All materials contained in http://www.LeadershipNow.com are protected by copyright and trademark laws and may not be used for any purpose whatsoever other than private, noncommercial viewing purposes. Derivative works and other unauthorized copying or use of stills, video footage, text or graphics is expressly prohibited. LeadershipNow is a trademark of M2 Communications. |
Comments
From a military perspective, discipline is paramount today let alone 2000 years ago. During the revolutionary war, George Washington was put in a similar circumstance when troops deserted his command due to the unbearable hardships and his response was uncannily similar and successful. There is no doubt that a military organization's mainstay is discipline which is often set by example. However, I can say with some authority that I am often struck by how civilian organizations misunderstand military discipline and often equate euphemistic concepts about it to their own environments. I have known many civilian managers who will say something to the effect, "well you know how to take orders," likening it to the military. I have to often explain that military personnel are not automatons; and rather then relying on orders, military leaders rely on everything but in their leadership style. The military relies on individuals at the lowest rank exercising judgements to execute missions, often relying on them to make difficult decisions and report results upwards to their commands. Leaders provide guidance, direction, and often need to be educated on the myriad of issues occuring by subordinate leaders and are not in a position to micromanage. Finally, I have often found that the civilian world relies exclusively on micromanagement then the military; and creates a civilian culture of fear and a form of suffocation occurs. Too much authority is given to first tier supervisors over their personnel with little regard by Senior Management to the psychological and physical consequences to employees entrusted to them. Often these first line and middle managers have no leadership training and the effects can be toxic. I consider this more frightening then what I just read about Caesar's actions over 2000 years ago.
Posted by: Matthew Laos | June 20, 2008 11:04 AM
As an executive search consultant with one of the world's leading search firms, I interview CEOs on a daily basis. I am no longer surprised by how many times I encounter comparisons between corporate leaders and ones in the military. I believe the one common trait that I have distilled after years of talking to these folks is that true leaders are those that can make common people do uncommon things. Caesar no doubt, is a supreme example of this leadership trait. The modes by which they make these folks do it differ. While decimation may seem to be an extreme illustration of this, making examples of employees that do not toe the mission line is still an accepted practice.
Posted by: Umesh Ramakrishnan | June 23, 2008 06:31 AM