Leading Blog


« Employees Who Quit, But Stay On | Leading Blog Main Page | Charles Koch on Decision Making »



03.19.07

Looking for Leaders

Recently someone was lamenting to me the lack of new leaders in their organization. I replied that perhaps they weren’t really looking for leaders. Maybe they were looking for leaders in all the wrong places. We commonly look for what looks like leadership. We look for people who stand out (self-promoters). We look for clones (people who are just like us). We look for the smartest person in the room (technically competent). We look for people who did a good job for us (promote as a reward). Sometimes we get lucky—often we don’t.

Ram Charan begins his fine contribution, Know-How, with, “What gets in the way of finding people who can perform is the appearance of leadership. All too often I see people being chosen for leadership jobs on the basis of superficial personal traits and characteristics.” He lists some of the trappings that are often mistaken for leadership:
The seduction of raw intelligence: “He’s extremely bright, incisive, and very analytical. I just feel in my gut he can do the job.”
A commanding presence and great communication skills: “That presentation was awesome. How she ever boiled down all that data onto the PowerPoints is beyond me. She certainly had the committee in the palm of her hand. Mark my words, she’s going to the top.”
The power of a bold vision: “What a picture he painted of where we are going, moving foreword.”
The notion of a born leader: “The people in the unit love her. Such a morale builder and motivator!”
As Charan points out, these attributes are just a small piece of the leadership pie. We need to look deeper.
True North


While there may be a shortage of leaders, “there is no shortage of people with the capacity for leadership” as Bill George points out in True North.  “The problem is that we have a wrongheaded notion of what constitutes a leader, driven by an obsession with leaders at the top. That misguided standard often results in the wrong people attaining critical leadership roles. … We frequently choose leaders for their charisma instead of their character, their style rather than substance, and their image instead of integrity.”

He adds, “There are leaders throughout organizations, just waiting for opportunities to lead. In too many organizations, however, people do not feel empowered to lead, nor are they rewarded for doing so.”

There is obviously a problem in the way that we approach leadership development. We are taking the path of least resistance. To put the right people in the right jobs and encourage their leadership potential, we must get to know them to see those things that really count. Our preconceived ideas of what a leader is, is just the thing that is getting in our way of finding great leaders. Our beliefs can set us up for selecting leaders that are dysfunctional.

Lists of leadership traits and characteristics can help to educate us, but leadership radiates from who we are. Leadership traits and characteristics are just part of the mix that defines who we really are—our character and attitudes. What else could we be doing to find true leaders?

Posted by Michael McKinney at 10:01 AM
| Comments (1) | TrackBacks (0) | Books , Leadership Development



TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.leadershipnow.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/180

Comments

Leadership is not for the few, rather it is for the many. The problem is that we exclude leadership education to those we deign to be the deserving few who merit our attention. Academia, consultants, and those who are privileged to occupy a leadership position often exclude the "led" from the discussion, training, and responsibility. This is what is wrong with leadership today. In the distant past, it was the many who chose their leaders, sometimes based off physical strength and sometimes based off the respect of their peers. Now, we rely on organizations to make the choice as to who leads and the masses must deal with it. The masses have lost their gut sense for what constitutes a genuine leader. The media portrays the most saavy, the academics the most published, the scientists the most brilliant, the rest are the most credentialized or approved. Politics of course pushes the most popular. Unfortunately, when these so called "leaders" operate in positions of real authority, their lack of leadership qualifications truly becomes apparent sometimes with devastating results economically, physically, and morally. We are never going to get better leaders until we begin to include the so called "led" into the education and discussions as to what should be expected of their leaders. Truly, when you challenge the many to be leaders themselves, they will no longer tolerate the unmistakable lapses in today's leaders. Leadership is for the many, not the few.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)



excerpts





Copyright ©1998-2009 LeadershipNow / M2 Communications All Rights Reserved
All materials contained in http://www.LeadershipNow.com are protected by copyright and trademark laws and may not be used for any purpose whatsoever other than private, noncommercial viewing purposes. Derivative works and other unauthorized copying or use of stills, video footage, text or graphics is expressly prohibited. LeadershipNow is a trademark of M2 Communications.